... to write this post.
But this blog has been the venue for many a discussion of the aims and ethics of theater criticism, not to mention one convoluted story about a local critic who blogged herself out of a job.
So Tboy would be less than responsible if he didn't draw your attention to a regrettable incident involving one of his own paper's longtime contributors. A explanatory Editor's Note appears in the Sept. 22 edition of the Washington City Paper, which hit the streets today, Thursday. It reads as follows:
On July 21, the Washington City Paper published Pamela Murray Winters' review of Ellington: The Life and Music of the Duke, a MetroStage production that closed on Aug. 20. Here's an excerpt from the review:
"Duke Ellington led an interesting life; unfortunately, you’d never know from David Scully’s grade-school lecture of a script, which is way more concerned with weary rhymin’ than with wit, energy, or even content. We get birth and death dates, and the idea that Ellington moved around a lot and changed his style to suit both himself and his audience, and that’s it."
As it turns out, this paper was in no position to render such summary judgments on Ellington. The reviewer left the show shortly after intermission and did not return, and the review made no mention of this [fact]. Washington City Paper regrets this inexcusable lapse in critical integrity and apologizes to MetroStage and all those involved in the production of Ellington.
Tboy will now set aside the third person briefly.
City Paper initially became aware of the Ellington incident when a non-MetroStage source brought it to my attention. This, as you may imagine, put me in a difficult position. The problem was compounded when, in inviting the paper to review Girl in the Goldfish Bowl, MetroStage specifically requested that I, in my present role as interim assigning editor for theater, agree not to send Winters.
On the one hand, I personally rather like Winters, who's written for us for years, and who's almost always available to pinch-hit when Bob Mondello and I can't get to every opening. Her reviews tend to be measured, informed, and often generous. The last theater piece she contributed, which included a review of Olney Theatre Center's In the Mood, was an honest and forthcoming response to a play that framed the life of a character with bipolar disorder, from the perspective of a writer who's dealt firsthand with someone living that condition.
On the other hand, I cannot think of any circumstance that would induce me to leave a performance early, neglect to inform my editors that I had bailed, and then file a review (negative or positive) that left readers under the impression that I'd seen the whole show. It's simply unethical.
After some thought, I discussed the matter with managing editor Andrew Beaujon, who took it up with Winters and with the newspaper's top editor, Erik Wemple. (I am not privy to the details of Winters' conversations with Beaujon and Wemple, or to the details of why she felt compelled to leave the performance early.)
I do know, however, that last Friday Wemple informed Winters that she will no longer be permitted to contribute to the newspaper.
Winters, when I spoke to her today, thanked me for the chance to respond, but indicated that she'd prefer not to discuss the incident or its fallout any further.
Recent Comments