. . . . . . . . . . . .

Tboy hangs with


Search Tboy

  •  
    tboy web

dc theaterfolk

Crass Commerce

theaterthinkers

Crass Commerce II

Crass Commerce III

Blogads

Crass Commerce IV

watch this

Technorati

SiteStats

« Tripping with Tboy | Main | From Wendy Goldberg... »

Monday, 05 February 2007

Comments

Jim

This debate with BLADE policy has gone on in DC for as long as I can remember. Greg's posting pretty much sums up the standard BLADE response. I do understand the notion of a gay paper wanting to report on gay-centric performances, since, purportedly, we can get news and critical response to mainstream work in mainstream places. But, can't that gay paper provide its readers with information about and critical response to artistic work from its perspective? A play and a production doesn't need to have an overt gay presence to be of particular value to a gay audience. In fact, many times, a gay perspective on a play or production might reveal a crucial connection to a gay readership. Maybe even, imagine this, a gay perspective might actually reveal a crucial connection to a mainstream audience.

The comments to this entry are closed.